We performed a comparison between INTELLIBOT and UiPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."For machine learning, there is an in-built document and text classification feature in INTELLIBOT. That is unlike other RPA tools where one needs to procure a separate license. Besides this, the application is easy to use. One valuable feature is the drag-and-drop feature for AI and email intelligence. It is easier than using UiPath's IQ bot."
"This solution is easy to use and requires little coding knowledge."
"The replay of the automation is an awesome feature."
"There's a helpful community available through the portal."
"It is a stable product. We have been using it for 15 months now, and there have been no issues."
"The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the straightforward visual editor, it has close to no code required. It allowed us to deploy the email monitoring in this couple of weeks."
"Our stability is great. You rarely have any downtime, once you build it."
"The unattended, back-office robots are the most beneficial feature."
"It's just easy. It streamlines our activities very well."
"To build automation using UiPath is fairly simple. The studio is quite easy to use. Even now, with the community edition, it’s great."
"The ability to do citizen development is the most valuable feature. That initiative has helped us to expand it because that gives folks that are closer to the business the ability to develop their own solutions that are tailored to what they need to do, as opposed to waiting for someone in IT to contact them to build it out. Or to wait for a business analyst to provide some type of value metric, but they can actually go and build it themselves."
"I found the Library option as most valuable because first, we can avoid the development of the same task again by developing and publishing a task as an activity into the Orchestrator, and second, in case of any changes required, the developer can make the required changes and republish in the Orchestrator with the new version."
"The platform is object-orientated. You can create and reuse objects, which is a great feature."
"There are a number of activities available in the UiPath Studio, which are enough to automate all types of tasks."
"A couple of times, we noticed that some bugs caused the bot to go in the wrong flow."
"The solution is heavily dependant on scripts, such as JavaScript or any other external script that needs to be a part of the system. If they want to grow, the scripting dependency should go away. They should have built-in libraries to pull in work from."
"Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values."
"I would like to see the cognitive marketing platform improved."
"Has limited functionality and uses extensive resources."
"The trigger actions need to be more robust."
"The first pain point of INTELLIBOT was with the development. Whenever the company developed any command, they published it directly onto their SQL site, and our current automation got auto-updated. The second pain point was with the action set. It could be stronger. Moreover, if I am doing UiPath automation, I have to do it with the Internal Report for now."
"Some of the releases have been a little shaky."
"The pricing for Orchestrator and unattended robots could use improvement. If we plan to roll out and implement more robots, then perhaps lower costs on Orchestrator and unattended robots would make adoption even easier."
"I would like to see more AI features with data classification and computer reason. I think it would be great to have more features in full monitoring robots."
"The UiPath tool doesn’t provide an option to resize the activities as per wish, especially if the activity is a big box."
"At this point, debugging, for me, is lacking the ability to edit on the go."
"It would also be great to have UiPath Insights included in the free Orchestrator. The Insights module is currently only available for paid licenses. It would be great for developers to have it included in the free version, because then we could try it out."
"The dashboard view could be more visually appealing. Dashboards in any software should stand out with colors, numbers, and other things, but in UiPath, the dashboard is not that visually appealing. The UiPath team could make it more visually appealing for us to get more insights."
"UiPath Studio supports three types of workflows: sequence, flowchart, and state machine. Flowchart and state machine are good. Sequences are also good, and they're for linear workflows. However, in a sequence, as we keep on dragging and dropping the reusable components, the size of the screen increases. If we drag and drop the conditional or looping activities on the site, the screen size increases in length and breadth, and it becomes too complex for a developer to navigate between activities."
INTELLIBOT is ranked 18th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 7 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 763 reviews. INTELLIBOT is rated 7.0, while UiPath is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of INTELLIBOT writes "Great studio, offers easy access for clients, and has a helpful community for troubleshooting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Facilitates end-to-end automation, has good AI and document understanding capabilities, and saves us costs previously spent on manual tasks". INTELLIBOT is most compared with , whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, Robocorp and Pega Robotic Process Automation. See our INTELLIBOT vs. UiPath report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
