We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."One of the best features is the last package security of upgrades to Microsoft Azure. Also, we like Azure's compatibility with other operating systems."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure is its ease of use."
"Azure's Data Lake services are decent. I like AKS, and API Management is relatively straightforward to use. The security and SIEM options Azure offers are good. All the infrastructure services are easy to use and set up."
"The solution is very simple to set up."
"I like the ExpressRoute because that makes it easy to configure connectivity to Azure-hosted services."
"Azure Data Lake is useful. We are in the process of populating the data lake for our current project. Also, we are directly importing for Power BI to using PowerPlay."
"Azure has the best website amongst all cloud computing platforms. It is simple to utilize, and one can release nearly anything, from app services to host sites."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ease of use."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Oracle Enterprise Manager was straightforward."
"SQL Tuning Advisor, ADDM, Top Activity, ASM Space Manager, Incident Notifications"
"It is a scalable solution. So far, my company has not faced any issues with the scalability part of the solution."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Enterprise Manager are the data guide and online monitoring."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager as a tool to monitor Oracle products."
"It's user friendly."
"The most valuable features are security and speed."
"This solution allows us to quickly drill down when there are issues."
"I would like to see Internet content filtering included."
"The pricing can be reduced."
"There were also a lot of constraints with the serverless parts."
"The solution is too expensive."
"Microsoft Azure can be pretty advanced and difficult to understand. I would like it to be simplified. The licensing especially needs to be simplified."
"The local support is fair but it is sometimes limited, the service could be better."
"Monitoring options should be more sophisticated, as there are dashboards on which a end user is able to pin a lot of charts and a number of web parts, but for example, I would love to have some option like in Operational Management Suite."
"It would be advantageous if the dashboard had more clarity, in terms of the visibility that it provides."
"Technical support could be faster."
"The solution's agents work with Java, and the Java code sometimes consumes a lot of memory on the CPU."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"The tool is expensive."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"The solution is not as simple as people say it is."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 299 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.