We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and Oracle VM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The feature that has had the most impact is data locality. That is a feature that makes Nutanix different from other hypervisors. It helps us to get application performance that is probably double what we got with the legacy, three-tier architecture."
"In terms of features, Acropolis is a good virtualization manager and that it is on-premise. I use almost every technology they provide."
"Nutanix AHV is very scalable. It can go to unlimited nodes."
"The product has helped consolidate a lot of my workload."
"Nutanix is good for new implementations on the VM side. It's very good for disaster recovery and final storage."
"It's user-friendly."
"The solution scales very well."
"Nutanix AHV's most valuable feature is NetFlow."
"The most valuable features of Oracle VM are live migration and snapshots."
"I like Oracle VM's vMotion and cloning features."
"I rate Oracle VM's scalability a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the resource management from the OVM Manager."
"Oracle is probably the best database technology out there. I've never found anything as complete in terms of feature and functionality and sophistication."
"Ability to patch with no downtime."
"Good visualization hypervisor."
"The virtualization product Oracle puts out just complements the performance of the database."
"There is room for improvement in the USB mapping."
"Lacks integration with the cloud or other solutions."
"The technical support for this solution needs to be improved in terms of response time."
"The solution could improve the call logging system to HPE, it is a bit tedious."
"The solution can be pricey."
"There is no web interface for AHV."
"The product must provide geo clusters."
"The price of Nutanix AHV Virtualization could improve."
"The pricing could be cheaper. It is very pricey."
"The performance could be better because I need to purchase a lot of CPUs to perform in the workbench."
"The documentation for implementation could be improved because we were not able to find an easy way to implement our company's features due to a lack of understanding."
"Its database management features could be better."
"Oracle VM could provide integration with backup solutions."
"It doesn't monitor everything, which is a little bit more difficult. It doesn't seem to have as many features or metrics to monitor as some others do, so you have to make some homemade scripts to do it."
"The solution is at its end of life and is about to be discontinued."
"Oracle VM should be more feature-rich."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 6th in Server Virtualization Software with 48 reviews while Oracle VM is ranked 7th in Server Virtualization Software with 78 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while Oracle VM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle VM writes "A cheap option available for Linux environments which is useful for many workloads". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM and XCP-ng virtualization platform, whereas Oracle VM is most compared with VMware vSphere, KVM, Oracle VM VirtualBox, Proxmox VE and Citrix Hypervisor. See our Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs. Oracle VM report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.