We performed a comparison between Oracle Content Management and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"SharePoint enabled the staff to share documents and work on a document simultaneously."
"It is well supported by Microsoft."
"The most valuable feature of SharePoint is its ease of use."
"The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows."
"It offers an easy way to store unstructured content (.pdf, .doc, .xls, images) and to tag them with metadata."
"The online editing capabilities, file sharing, auditing, information security, ease of solution management, and the easy user adaptation to the platform are the most valuable features."
"Removed the need of paper storage and people flow into the office."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is file sharing or information sharing."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
"Using SharePoint is difficult."
"The support is the worst. It is bad when Microsoft support does not even know what to do and you have to tell them. Also, they take too long to solve a problem."
"The solution should be made more user-friendly for technical and business people."
"The product could be improved in a lot of way. It is so frustrating to get things to work as advertised."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents."
"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."
Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 149 reviews. Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive, Alfresco and OpenText Extended ECM, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.