We performed a comparison between Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The tool is very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The dashboard provides pretty good clarity."
"The solution can scale."
"It’s easy to maintain, as everything is handled by SAP."
"The HANA replications are very useful."
"Cloud Platform's stability is great."
"To be able to define multiple sub accounts in order to accommodate and separate development, test, and productive environments."
"One of the most valuable features I have found is that the solution is secure."
"Feature-wise, I like it since it allows you to integrate with multiple applications. There are available connectors that allow you to integrate."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
"The tool has minor bugs."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."
"One crucial aspect where SAP lags behind in flexibility is customization to suit specific business requirements. SAP needs to understand that customization is inevitable and should be more supportive of business-driven customization."
"Lacks flexibility in its licensing structure."
"It would be helpful to have additional samples for SoapUI that include interface methodologies and templates."
"They are still developing this product. It does not really have 100% of the necessary features available to properly service business clients"
"I would like for it to have integration to GitHub."
"I can’t speak to features that may be missing."
"My impression of the stability is that it is not good. Almost every month there is something new and that makes us nervous about delivery."
"Better connectivity to on-premise systems would help us to support older systems that are migrating to the cloud."
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 18th in Rapid Application Development Software with 5 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 6th in PaaS Clouds with 38 reviews. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and webMethods.io Integration.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.