We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"Scalable and stable BPM software with a powerful case management feature. It also has good workflow."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"The solution offers excellent workflows."
"The case management functionality of this solution has been most valuable."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"In the next release of Pega BPM, they should add more ways to do the customer interaction fields in the portals."
"The solution's pricing model or licensing model could be a little better."
"This is an expensive solution."
"This is a quite expensive product."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
Pega BPM is ranked 8th in Rapid Application Development Software with 58 reviews while Unqork is ranked 25th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Unqork is most compared with Appian, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform, OutSystems and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.