We performed a comparison between Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Ease of Deployment: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has an easy setup with clear instructions and helpful engineers. Deployment is seamless, although the time may vary. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup can be difficult and time-consuming, requiring daily monitoring and maintenance, and it can take anywhere from a few hours to a month.
Features: Prisma Cloud offers a management console, compliance monitoring, and micro-segmentation, as well as auto-remediation capabilities and vulnerability scanning. Trend Micro Cloud One has excellent vulnerability protection and login inspection, as well as control over server access and application installation, and good workload management. Prisma Cloud needs more customizable dashboards, better automation, better coverage for GCP and Oracle, and improved support. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One needs improvements in pricing, Azure support, automation, robustness, initial setup, and alerts.
Pricing: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a convoluted credit-based pricing model that can be difficult to comprehend, although it is deemed pricey, it is deemed a good investment for safeguarding multi-cloud setups. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the mid-range and can be paid monthly, quarterly, or yearly. While extra services may accumulate, the overall cost is seen as fair and has even decreased by 25% in recent times.
Service and Support: Prisma Cloud has received mixed reviews, with some customers praising their technical support and account managers, while others experienced slow response times. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One has generally received positive feedback for their knowledgeable and responsive support team.
ROI: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides better risk clarity, faster issue detection, improved compliance, and increased productivity compared to Trend Micro Cloud One. However, Trend Micro Cloud One is more flexible and easier to integrate.
Comparison Results: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is the preferred option over Trend Micro Cloud One based on user reviews. Prisma Cloud offers a wider range of features, including continuous cloud compliance monitoring, network security, and identity-based micro-segmentation, and provides a single pane of glass for multi- and hybrid-cloud environments.
"It is scalable, stable, and can detect any threat on a machine. It uses artificial intelligence and can lock down any virus."
"The UI is very good."
"The management console is highly intuitive to comprehend and operate."
"We liked the search bar in PingSafe. It is a global search. We were able to get some insights from there."
"It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."
"PingSafe's graph explorer is a valuable tool that lets us visualize all connected services."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."
"The management console is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability monitoring, serverless access, container runtime features, and Defender."
"The ability to monitor the artifact repository is one of the most valuable features because we have a disparate set of development processes, but everything tends to land in a common set of artifact repositories. The solution gives us a single point where we can apply security control for monitoring. That's really helpful."
"The container and serverless security is most valuable. It is quite a new technology for this region. Even though containers have been there for a long time, the adoption of containers is very minimal in this region. When it comes to using Kubernetes containers in a complex architecture, there is a lack of security in the market. People aren't aware of the security controls or the process for governance. Container security provided by Prisma Cloud is quite good at filling that gap."
"The most valuable feature is the option to add custom queries using the RQL language that they supply so that we can customize the compliance frameworks to what we need to look for."
"We were pleased with Prisma's custom and built-in reports. We could go into the dashboard and see all these notifications telling us which subscriptions didn't have TLS 1.2 enabled. The security controls were the most valuable features."
"It provides good visibility and control regardless of the complexity."
"This solution helped us by allowing us to schedule and fix things. This is not an easy thing if you're managing 1,000 plus resources."
"The product provides very good network security."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"The security is good."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"Whenever I view the processes and the process aspect, it takes a long time to load."
"Scanning capabilities should be added for the dark web."
"I export CSV. I cannot export graphs. Restricting it to the CSV format has its own disadvantages. These are all machine IP addresses and information. I cannot change it to the JSON format. The export functionality can be improved."
"I want PingSafe to integrate additional third-party resources. For example, PingSafe is compatible with Azure and AWS, but Azure AD isn't integrated with AWS. If PingSafe had that ability, it would enrich the data because how users interact with our AWS environment is crucial. All the identity-related features require improvement."
"We've found a lot of false positives."
"I would like additional integrations."
"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"One thing that is missing is Cloud Run runtime security—serverless. That would be great to have in the tool. It's not that easy to have Cloud Run in specific environments."
"We identified two things that we felt would be great to have, but they are under NDA. So, I can't disclose them. Other than those two things, we identified a generic bug in the secret key management service on AWS that needs to be fixed. We reported it to them, and we want them to fix it."
"I have some challenges customizing and personalizing some of the capabilities in the CSPM in terms of new policies and services. We have to reconfigure and rebuild the CSPM."
"Prisma is good about compliance, and their support is excellent, but they struggle with automation and integration. They need to stay on top of the newest types of connectors. How can you connect other applications and other tools in order for this to work cohesively? That's a challenge."
"When it comes to compliance, the issue is that when we are exporting the reports, there is only a single compliance option. If I need to report on multiple compliance requirements, that feature isn't available. For example, I made a single report for ISO 27000 but I can't correlate it with GDPR."
"We have discovered that Prisma is not functioning properly with GCP."
"The information presented in the UI sometimes doesn't look intuitive enough."
"It would be ideal if they could somehow reduce the deployment time."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The pricing can get high."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 82 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub and CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and AWS Security Hub. See our Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors, best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors, and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
