We performed a comparison between Asana and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The general UI shows progress and data analytics for all projects in progress."
"The only thing I love about the product is that it is beautiful."
"Stable Kanban style tool for collaboration and task management. It runs smoothly and has a straightforward setup."
"It has helped our departments maintain visibility."
"I really enjoy the portfolios in Asana. One of the ways Asana stands out to me is with portfolios. You can have all your different projects, and you can have those assigned to different teams. If you want to customize a grouping of projects, you can use portfolios. For instance, one of the things that we do is we can assign a portfolio to a specific strategic objective we have, and we can put all those projects that are related to that strategic objective in that portfolio. We then know exactly what people are working on to help us achieve our goals. So, I really like portfolios."
"I love the way it monitors all of the current and past projects, and it sends notifications to keep everything on the track."
"Asana allows you to create your own project with sub sections with subtasks that can be assigned. The feature I really love is that you can tag people to notify them that there has been progress on a project as well as add attachments."
"The tool has a lot of integrations."
"The most valuable features of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management are the multiple methodology possibilities for projects. It has hybrid, traditional, and Agile capabilities. Additionally, the solution integrates well with other platforms, such as Microsoft Azure."
"The feature I find the most valuable is the one that lets you see how much time has been used in processing a ticket. This allows us to better monitor performance."
"The demand management tool is very strategic because it helps assess risk, gives you a visual of different demands, and rates those values."
"As a product, the primary reason we like it is it gets integrated with our ITSM solution so that we don't have to go for an external product for project management like Jira."
"The most important feature of ServiceNow IT Business Management is flexibility."
"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very intuitive to set up."
"Everything is valuable. It is tough to choose a particular feature, but project portfolio management along with agile 2.0 are two key product features that I would suggest for services companies like us."
"It's a very complete solution."
"The messaging feature could be better."
"Some customizations and functions are still not available, however, so far, they haven't been a deal killer."
"The product must reduce the information on the interface."
"The solution can be difficult for new users to use because of the interface."
"The calendar view in Asana has shortcomings and can be improved."
"It would be beneficial if Asana had a predecessor feature that automatically adjusts all subsequent dates when changes are made to a timeline. For example, if I assign a designer four hours for one task and two days for another, and the completion of a task takes longer than anticipated, it would be convenient if updating one date could prompt the adjustment of all other relevant dates. Essentially, this feature would streamline the process and eliminate the need for manual adjustments."
"This solution has a learning curve, where it is initially difficult to use."
"It's hard to integrate Asana into other parts of the company workflow, so integration is an area for improvement."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"When we import a really big project with a lot of tasks on it, we face some issues with dependencies. The links between tasks are not working very well. There is definitely room for improvement there. Microsoft Project, in my opinion, is the best option for such a use case."
"The cost could be improved. The solution is quite pricey."
"ServiceNow needs to invest more in integration. That's the only thing. It could always extend its portfolio a little bit."
"The product does not give us the freedom to capture all the instances, test cases, and evidence."
"The user interface could be more modern."
"The configurations are fine, but the user interface could be improved."
"The solution needs a few things in terms of resource management."
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 27 reviews. Asana is rated 8.4, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Extremely stable, user-friendly, and easy to navigate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project, Wrike, monday.com and Bitrix24, whereas ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server and Adobe Workfront. See our Asana vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.