We performed a comparison between AWS Firewall Manager and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is intuitive and it is easy for the users."
"The most valuable feature is the centrally managed rule. I also like the central orchestration."
"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."
"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."
"Also, the strength of the community is invaluable."
"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."
"Palo Alto technical support is excellent."
"I found it easy to learn how to pull information from the logs."
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama is stable."
"It is really useful for big deployments."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable item is centralization and we can get all of the router bases in a single window."
"It's a reliable solution."
"The ability to manage a large number of firewalls from a single point is most valuable."
"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."
"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."
"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."
"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"
"Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward."
"The system should be more customizable."
"The initial setup requires expertise and can be a bit complex."
"We have had some issues in the past because integrating a new device is not intuitive."
"The customer support needs to be better."
"It could be easier to manage. In the future, it should be much easier because it's not very easy to manage. So in the next release, I think it should be much easier to manage, especially in the first configuration. It could also be more stable."
"As the cybersecurity threats have become more aggressive these days, Palo Alto Networks Panorama can still be improved, particularly on the security side, for example, more network management, and penetration test. Improving the security feature for internal endpoints is needed in the solution."
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama has some bugs that could be fixed."
"The product could offer more integration with other solutions."
"I would like more dashboard management."
AWS Firewall Manager is ranked 8th in Firewall Security Management with 6 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 81 reviews. AWS Firewall Manager is rated 7.8, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Firewall Manager writes "Streamlining security and enhanced file transfer control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". AWS Firewall Manager is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Azure Firewall Manager, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, Tufin Orchestration Suite and FireMon Security Manager, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Tufin Orchestration Suite, Skybox Security Suite and FireMon Security Manager. See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.