We performed a comparison between CA Unified Communications Monitor and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"Good end-to-end monitoring"
"The most valuable features in Zabbix are those that help us overcome bottlenecks in CPU usage, as well as reduce memory delay. I know that we have only reached the tip of the iceberg of what Zabbix's features can do for us, and we have not used all of them yet."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the ease with which we can set it up at customer sites with our custom Zabbix proxy and tools."
"In terms of customization and integration, we have more flexibility. We can automate configurations, define deletion rules, and customize based on the needs. The client interface allows for further configuration, making it quite comprehensive."
"Zabbix is an excellent performance monitoring tool."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"The solution is stable."
"Zabbix is very easy to implement."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."
"Look and feel."
"My company wanted to do an exercise command to access IT from Cameroon. They wanted to access an FSS to a second host with second equipment that was on another coast but it is not possible on Zabbix to do it. They want to directly access from the front-end of Zabbix to access a prompt in Zabbix to an access terminal. In the front-end, there is no way to do that. That would be an important improvement."
"I would like for this solution to be more cloud-friendly."
"There is a bit of a learning curve during installation."
"It should be easy to modify the front end."
"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."
"Zabbix does not draw automatic mapping of the network, this is something they should add in the future. There is a lot of effort that is involved in tailoring some of the settings which could be made easier."
"There are a lot of areas for improvement, specifically in the dashboards and reports functionalities."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Unified Communications Monitor is ranked 95th in Network Monitoring Software while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. CA Unified Communications Monitor is rated 6.6, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CA Unified Communications Monitor writes "Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". CA Unified Communications Monitor is most compared with , whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI. See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.