We performed a comparison between Camunda and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
"The product is stable."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"It has an open BPM"
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The best feature is the automation."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."
"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, Appian and Bizagi. See our Camunda vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
