We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Elastic Search based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution is quite scalable and this is one of its advantages."
"X-Pack provides good features, like authorization and alerts."
"The solution offers good stability."
"The search speed is most valuable and important."
"It is easy to scale with the cluster node model."
"The most valuable features are its user-friendly interface and seamless navigation."
"The most valuable features are the data store and the X-pack extension."
"It is highly valuable because of its simplicity in maintenance, where most tasks are handled for you, and it offers a plethora of built-in features."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"The reports could improve."
"I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or enhancements right now."
"Kibana should be more friendly, especially when building dashboards."
"It is hard to learn and understand because it is a very big platform. This is the main reason why we still have nothing in production. We have to learn some things before we get there."
"Elastic Enterprise Search's tech support is good but it could be improved."
"The metadata gets stored along with indexes and isn't queryable."
"The GUI is the part of the program which has the most room for improvement."
"The solution has quite a steep learning curve. The usability and general user-friendliness could be improved. However, that is kind of typical with products that have a lot of flexibility, or a lot of capabilities. Sometimes having more choices makes things more complex. It makes it difficult to configure it, though. It's kind of a bitter pill that you have to swallow in the beginning and you really have to get through it."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Indexing and Search with 59 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Elastic Search is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Logz.io, whereas Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone and Azure Search.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.