We performed a comparison between Coralogix and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"The simplicity of the dashboard is very good."
"It offers helpful user metrics so we can learn more about the user experience."
"New Relic has helped us in terms of the optimizing our print and loading times."
"One valuable feature is that the synthetic alert stays open until the issue is resolved. You can actually monitor whether your system is back up."
"We detect issues using dashboards that we built on New Relic."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"As New Relic is already integrated with Drupal, we can get our projects done with best practice and with the best value that we believe in."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"Compared to their competitors, they are missing some features at the moment."
"One thing I'd like to see in any APM, especially New Relic, is the ability to use distributed transactions. When one microservice calls another, it calls another database and microservice. The entire data visualization layer will not be able to correlate from one microservice from end to end and return on that path. Distributed transactions would be a great addition that would make life simpler. Unfortunately, no APM has that end-to-end capability."
"We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health."
"They don't have an opportunity to share the dashboard with the public. If you want to share it with stakeholders or people outside the organization who just want to have a look at a couple of metrics, you can't do that without onboarding them to the product itself."
"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."
"It gives you amazing statistics, but doesn’t give you enough information about what to do with the statistics."
"The browser isn't exactly reliable."
"The solution is quite expensive."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus. See our Coralogix vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.