We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a good platform and the very best in the current market. We looked at the Forester report from December 2022 where it was said to be a leader."
"Enables monitoring of application performance and the ability to predict behaviors."
"Just the ability to do a lot more than just up-down is nice, which a lot of people take for granted."
"It's not very complicated to install Elastic."
"The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards."
"The performance is good and it is faster than IBM QRadar."
"Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because of Elastic's efficient search engine."
"The solution has a good community surrounding it for lots of helpful documentation for troubleshooting purposes."
"I would say that this solution has the best support team in this kind of Endpoint protection product."
"It is pretty easy to deploy. Its update definition file is small, so it can dispatch very quickly within the enterprise. The product itself is very lightweight, so it won't delay your endpoint. You also don't have to do any difficult configuration because it comes with a very good default setting. So, you just install it and forget it."
"I rate ESET Endpoint Security eight out of 10 for ease of setup. Setting up ESET can be straightforward or complicated depending on the customer's environment. The deployment time varies, but it's typically around five days. We have a team of four or five people involved in the deployment. Only one person is needed for maintenance. The only maintenance is adjusting the configuration of the dashboard."
"The most valuable feature in ESET Endpoint Security is the game mode to restrict notifications."
"ESET Endpoint Security is stable. When comparing the solution to competitors it is more stable."
"It's light. I almost don't know that I am using it."
"This solution does not slow down your systems. It is very light."
"There are some great features in ESET Endpoint Antivirus when you are browsing on the internet. For example, they have a notification if within your LAN network something is suspected to be a threat. Additionally, the malware features are very good."
"The interface could be more user friendly because it is sometimes hard to deal with."
"In terms of what could be improved with Elastic, in some use cases, especially on the advanced level, they are not ready made, so you'll have to write some scripts."
"I would like the process of retrieving archived data and viewing it in Kibana to be simplified."
"This solution cannot do predictive maintenance, so we have to build our own modules for doing it."
"One thing they could add is a quick step to enable users who don't have a solid background to build a dashboard and quickly search, without difficulty."
"Improvements in Elastic Security could include refining and normalizing queries to make them more user-friendly, enhancing the user experience with better documentation, and addressing any latency issues."
"It's a little bit of a learning curve to understand the logic of searching for things and trying to find what you're looking for in Elastic Security."
"The tool needs to integrate with legacy servers. Big companies can have legacy servers that may not always be updated."
"The initial setup of ESET Endpoint Security was not complex because we have five years of experience. However, it is not as easy if we did not have the experience."
"There are no areas for improvement. It does everything the consumer needs."
"The product should provide a one-click option to renew the licenses."
"I think that ESET is a little too heavy on the CPU."
"Data Leak Protection is is what we are searching for at the moment. It is not included with ESET."
"After we did the initial setup of ESET Endpoint Security, we had to inform users about popups. This solution comes with an in-built software firewall and there can be some popups coming. We must tell the user not to keep, allow, or block anything. That is the main issue on the user side we have faced. The user's experience may not be as good."
"There are some complexities if you want to manipulate the software."
"The solution could have a more user-friendly interface."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 59 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 97 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Fortinet FortiEDR. See our ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Elastic Security report.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
