We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most important is that the solution is stable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"The performance is good."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"The reliability is good."
"I like the fact that you can set it up like a wireless connection. Previously, we used to connect from one SSID to another. When we started using Ubiquiti, everyone was so happy because even if they moved from one place or another, say from the pantry to a meeting room, they didn't need to connect manually to another SSID. This is one of the features that I really like about it. It is doing a great job. It offers a free controller that you can use to see if the devices are connected or not and if they are up or down."
"We had a client with a power plant. Different wireless devices from various brands caused problems. We fixed it using the Ubiquiti Wireless UDM controller and installed 75 access points and antennas."
"Overall, it's a straightforward solution."
"Their hardware is very good."
"In general, the setup process is straightforward."
"Having dual-band is important. Having compatibility with very old equipment on certain frequencies, for example on 2.4 and 5.8."
"We use the solution for many of our smaller customers and the cloud management aspect of the solution is very good. If you compare it to other vendors that have a controller, it's much easier to manage the cloud-based solution because we travel a lot. It allows us to manage everything from any place."
"The solution has an easy configuration."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"There's one feature missing and that is automatic channel assignment."
"Sometimes we have some micro breaks we do not know what causes them."
"They should have more VLAN features and a designing tool like a link planer."
"They have access points that are in the firewalls, and I believe the firewalls could be significantly better. They use the USG firewall, which I believe is a poor device. VPNs for example, it is really bad, it is difficult to configure, and I don't like them at all."
"I would prefer if the solution offered more integration capabilities."
"Tech support is mostly remote and could be better."
"The range and maybe the quality of the signal can be improved. I had a feeling that the range wasn't long enough. Unfortunately, beyond a certain range, the signal was too weak. If I'm not mistaken, it must have been something like 100 or more than 100 meters, but I'm not sure. So, one improvement I wish for this equipment is to have a longer range, but that could mainly be due to the model we're using."
"The product lacks some security features."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.