We performed a comparison between Intercept X Endpoint and N-able EDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."Impressive detection capabilities"
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"The stability is very good."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Sophos Intercept X is easy to install and has a lower price than similar solutions."
"One of the best features of Sophos Intercept is that it repairs without slowing down the system."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Everything in Intercept X Endpoints is much centralised which makes it easy for our team to work with. The functions are in a single portal."
"The most valuable feature is the CryptoGuard in Sophos. In a case of a ransomware attack, this feature comes into action to protect us."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is less hash-based than competitors."
"The EDR (Enhanced Data Detection and Response) and the DLP (Data Loss Prevention) components are valuable assets."
"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."
"The solution is not stable."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Detections could be improved."
"The Data Loss Prevention module can be better. It should also have threat hunting capabilities."
"They should keep doing what they're doing. Both of them have entered the EDR/MDR space, and they're keeping up with their competitors. I have a hard time understanding why their capabilities aren't garnering more attention."
"Sophos has a lot of different features. Some of them are tied to different clients, which may mean that different prices or licenses have to be added on. It can be a little bit confusing if you're not familiar with the logic of how they work. They can make it a little bit clearer."
"We are considering switching from this solution as a result of the closer integration needed between the firewall systems and the EDR."
"The integration has room for improvement, especially with Mac OS."
"The product defends very well on its own but could possibly use enhancement in giving users more controls."
"To be a perfect product, the price would have to be a bit better."
"It should offer better security updates."
"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."
Earn 20 points
Intercept X Endpoint is ranked 4th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 101 reviews while N-able EDR is ranked 57th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Intercept X Endpoint is rated 8.4, while N-able EDR is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Intercept X Endpoint writes "A standard offering with good threat analysis but reduces machine performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able EDR writes "Stable, effective rollback feature, and useful AI models". Intercept X Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Seqrite Endpoint Security, whereas N-able EDR is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Inspect, Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Cisco Secure Endpoint.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.