We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and SentinelOne based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Based on our users’ reviews, SentinelOne is a stronger, more secure solution. SentinelOne offers a deeper and more robust level of security. Additionally, SentinelOne provides consistent protection across Windows, Linux, and macOS. It can also support legacy infrastructures as well as many newer environments. The single-pane feature helps protect numerous endpoints with a lean team, saving time and money and improving TCO and ROI. Users are also happier with SentinelOne’s pricing.
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The implementation and integration are easy."
"It is an effective solution. It provides a wide range of security and defense features."
"Deployment and centralized management are essential for us because of the number of loads that we have along with the number of geographic locations where we are based."
"I like how it protects the network and all the endpoints."
"The failure rate is very low."
"Using dashboards, it is very easy to manage."
"The signature update is done securely."
"I like the security that this solution provides."
"Singularity's rollback feature is one of the primary reasons we bought the product. If there's an attack on the machine, the system can automatically roll back the data and the hard drive of the machine that was attacked."
"The autonomous platform is valuable because we can separate false positives and negatives."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to drill down into individual sequences of processes."
"The solution is both stable and scalable."
"SentinelOne's auto-rollback feature is the most valuable."
"I like Singularity's rollback features, threat-hunting, and Ranger Insights. The Ranger feature scans the network and provides visibility into all the unsecured assets."
"I was extremely happy with their technical staff. The solution's tech support is top-notch. They have some really good engineers on their team."
"Most of the features are valuable. As a system integrator, agent deployment is valuable. It also fits the requirements of most of the clients."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The solution is not stable."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The licensing fees could be reduced."
"We would like it so that if a user uses it on-premises, the server should use fewer hardware resources."
"The product offers support only through mail and not on the phone."
"We need a more complete Mobile Device Management (MDM) system."
"The process for upgrades is very slow."
"The solution could improve by providing a cloud service that synchronizes with the on-premise console which would give better connectivity in remote areas."
"It would be beneficial to have more robust cloud management capabilities for Endpoint."
"It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features."
"In terms of improvement, the documentation could be better. I would also like to see SingularityOne compatibility with Huntress, and the tighter integration between them would bring more to the table."
"All is good for now, but we cannot rest, and continuous development - in particular with regard to the areas of automation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence - is required to keep ahead of the cybercriminals."
"The SentinelOne portal is not user-friendly, which is one of its drawbacks."
"It is not so much on the Singularity platform itself, but they have their own built-in SIEM that is included with it. That needs to evolve a little bit. It is relatively basic in its capabilities. They have potential there for a great product and a needed product too. Having some kind of SIEM capability with the endpoint solution will save me from buying a bigger SIEM or buying another one. I could just use the one that comes with my endpoint solution."
"I would like to have the same features such as ransomware that are available on the cloud version of SentinelOne also made available for the on-prem version because a lot of people in our region are not ready for cloud solutions."
"I would like to see something a little more sophisticated than simply being able to mark a false positive as safe or there's usually just one or two options in certain areas and they're a little rudimentary at this stage."
"The reporting needs improvement and I would like to see a more granular level of administrative privileges."
"There should be Terraform support for console administration. Dynamic tagging would be also useful."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 11th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 111 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 177 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Fortinet FortiClient, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Darktrace, CrowdStrike Falcon, ThreatLocker Protect and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.