We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Firewall Analyzer is easy to work with."
"Firewall Analyzer helps our organization to fulfill the compliance requirement as per ISO 27001, managing the network security effectively."
"The most valuable features of the ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer are the monitoring of the full management of the network elements and the inventory of the infrastructure."
"I found the reporting to be useful because not only can I go back months, but it lists the individual URLs and the time that a particular person visited."
"Overall the solution does a good job."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool compared to other solutions."
"The most valuable feature is that it extends security entries in the firewall policies."
"The features I have found most valuable are its capability to check on the firewall and the routers. Afterwards it checks out all the configs, checks the vulnerabilities, checks the risks - it checks everything that may end up causing our router to be compromised. At the end it recommendations what we should do."
"There are a lot of benefits to using the reporting. It gives us duplicate objects, duplicate services, shadow firewall rules, and the firewall rules not needed for a given number of days or months."
"The APIs are the most valuable feature of this solution, as they facilitate integration with ServiceNow and other solutions."
"It is an important application for controlling and monitoring firewall rules. It is useful for making and monitoring the changes."
"The consolidation of other firewall vendors is very valuable."
"The designer gives the ability to know where to add a rule, or if the rule is already in place."
"I like the fact that Tufin was able to integrate with our firewalls, which include Palo Alto and FortiGate."
"The solution lacks a lot of features that other products have in the marketplace."
"ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer can improve by having better monitoring of all features from firewalls. We are using Kibana in order to monitor parts that this solution does not record. For example, having more correlation and proactive monitoring in some activity or scenario."
"If there is a need to get some customized report or anything, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer takes some time."
"The stability is so-so. There are always memory issues, but the solution is working great apart from that."
"It would be awesome if the product could monitor services for applications."
"Our initial setup was complex from two dimensions, because we were deploying it globally and had to have a centralized view, but a distributed approach. We had it in Asia and North America, causing a slightly complicated approach."
"We like the change impact analysis capabilities quite a bit. The only weakness is that the reporting is a bit clunky. We would like to have the reporting be better."
"I would like to see improved role-based access."
"We will be using the appliance based product, which cannot be scaled as much. It is a limitation in the hardware."
"They are sort of at the pilot stage on some of their products. I saw the Orca and Iris products yesterday. My initial impression of these products were that they were good products, but I felt like some of their features overlapped with SecureTrack and SecureChange, which they are already doing. So, I just wondered what direction they're going in? I understand that they are cloud products, but are these security products going to overlap each other's features at some point? This is my initial concern."
"One feature that is missing is the ability to assign a step in the workflow to a specific user at a specific time, based on how the previous steps of the workflow have been handled."
"The two main negative points with Tufin Orca are the absence of full support and that accommodation of files and tools is not provided in a good way."
"I would like to see them get rid of the REST APIs and use something more modern."
More ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer is ranked 11th in Firewall Security Management with 7 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 180 reviews. ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer is rated 8.2, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer writes "Offers good integration features and is user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Skybox Security Suite, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco Defense Orchestrator. See our ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.