We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."While Microsoft Intune boasts a wide range of features, its user-friendliness and bundled licensing cost are key considerations for me."
"The stability is good."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"I like the tool's integration with Apple. Anyone who creates an ID in Intune will get an Apple ID."
"Being able to manage the devices remotely is most valuable. We can push security requirements through Microsoft Intune."
"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."
"The ability to push applications on devices is valuable. You do not have to manually install applications one by one. If you like to use ten different applications, you do not have to manually go and download them one by one. Intune can compile a package for you, and then you can just push them from the admin center."
"I can see that the patch management process is much improved with the bundled patch management option available in Microsoft Intune compared to the KPI deployment required by the other deployment solutions."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"One of the most valuable features is the ease of moving items from one configuration to another; it's a Windows-like setup. Also, the admin console is very easy to manage and to move through."
"I have experience with technical support. They are quite good. Also, they very quickly understand the issues and what are the requirements from my side. Response time is also good."
"The most valuable features are remote control and geo-fencing."
"The keywords menu is better than other MDM. They have an Out of Contact policy, which other MDMs don't have."
"The remote control we have helps us a lot."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"I've really enjoyed the use of the file sync when I'm administrating version control in my program."
"The other one would be just how easy it is to deploy applications."
"Microsoft needs to enhance device-level security, as sometimes when using Microsoft Intune, the device's operating system becomes stuck and requires a full uninstall to remove the Intune bug."
"The product needs to upgrade itself when the server is overloaded."
"There could be more wizard-driven policy development or creation. Some of the policies can get quite complex. If they have a wizard that assists the administrators in creating the policy, that will be a great job."
"There's quite a lot of development that they can do within their Intune dashboard. I think there are too many lines hyperlinked to move you around. Others, in contrast, give you a simple dashboard and an intuitive administrative walkthrough."
"An area for improvement is the absence of seamless integration, particularly with external dashboards."
"A new Intune feature allows application packaging, but it incurs additional licensing costs for a significant number of applications."
"The reports that are generated aren't so great. They don't give a lot of meaning so far, but that could be down to user knowledge than the actual reporting side of things. I'm not a big user of it, but I was a bigger user of MaaS360, and we used to be able to run weekly and monthly reports. In the case of any deviations. we'd get a warning immediately. That's not so easy to do or to get in place for Intune. This could be just a user issue, but when I compare both, that's the only thing that's lacking for me."
"The reports aren't complete, and it's not easy to build custom reports. For example, Windows Autopilot isn't working well in cases where the computers don't have a good internet connection. Then the option is not good enough."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"Most of our devices are Android, they're Google related, so we need access from Google to do certain things. There are ways around that, but that's something that we're really looking for. How can we control the Apple Air? How can we get into that app?... How can we make sure that that app doesn't try to update in the middle of the day when our driver needs it?"
"It would be helpful if the product offered more integration and more features around the iOS and macOS platforms."
"They should improve the lockdown feature."
"SOTI MobiControl currently lacks some DLP features."
"Its user interface needs to be improved."
"They don't have systems that are built for redundancy. You have one database that manages everything and, if that database crashes, you have a problem."
"I would like to see some SMS integration so people can send data directly from a mobile phone through SMS when there's no internet."
ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review while SOTI MobiControl is ranked 5th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 47 reviews. ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0, while SOTI MobiControl is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SOTI MobiControl writes "Provides enterprise mobility and remote control mobile device management". ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Google Endpoint Management, IBM MaaS360 and VMware Workspace ONE, whereas SOTI MobiControl is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, 42Gears SureMDM, Jamf Pro, IBM MaaS360 and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
