We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure App Service and Temenos Quantum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very easy to use. That's one of the advantages for the business, that you don't need to struggle to configure your website and your app service. Microsoft made sure to make it stable and very easy to configure."
"The cost is reasonable."
"The best feature is scalability, which allows you to target potential clients worldwide by connecting the application to a local server. This makes the application readily accessible, and the response time will be much better."
"The solution can scale."
"One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure App Service is autoscaling and resource grouping. Additionally, the integration works well, it is easy to do."
"The Logic Apps and Azure functions are very robust."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure App Service is customization. It provides the building block from its modularity. You can add what you need with the appropriate code."
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."
"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."
"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."
"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."
"The main benefit lies in its exceptional speed of implementation."
"I like the complete, professional social site."
"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."
"It would be fantastic if Microsoft morphed after my exit service, removing it from subscriptions and moving it to different regions, especially for that service."
"The solution is quite expensive. If you need more features, you need to pay for them."
"If you are not using the product properly, then it can cost you a lot of money. Hence, you need to make sure that you choose the services wisely. You need to make sure that you have a budget and have some alerts associated with it. The tool's cost can easily go high if you don't consider these things properly. You need to review your existing subscription."
"Initially, there were some rare instances when the server went down because it was deployed on Linux."
"The pricing is average. It could be lower."
"Microsoft Azure App Service needs some improvement in the scaling area."
"If you're on the cloud, you just get a web interface without much detail for additional configuration or the authority to configure the root or system-level configuration."
"Microsoft Azure App Service could improve by having better integration with on-premise solutions."
"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."
"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."
"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."
"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
Microsoft Azure App Service is ranked 6th in Mobile Development Platforms with 38 reviews while Temenos Quantum is ranked 9th in Mobile Development Platforms with 15 reviews. Microsoft Azure App Service is rated 8.4, while Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure App Service writes "A solution with great server management and helps improve performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". Microsoft Azure App Service is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Pega BPM and HCL Domino, whereas Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems and ServiceNow. See our Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Temenos Quantum report.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.