We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure is its ease of use."
"Active Directory is a good feature. The infrastructure features that Azure provides are also good."
"Storage has made remote access to files much more painless and easy."
"We have found the most valuable feature to be the pricing calculator."
"The product makes it easy to spin up new environments and develop new technologies."
"Azure virtual machines are stand-out."
"The integration with Databricks is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"Azure Active Directory: Has powerful security and auditing capabilities that we use to secure all our apps."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager triggers critical alerts."
"The dashboards are great for gathering analytic information and seeing where the problems are."
"I have found the uptime of all of our systems to be most valuable with this solution. This is important because we need to guarantee specific uptime and preventive maintenance. We need to know upfront if there are going to be any issues on the database so we can proactively solve those."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Oracle Enterprise Manager was straightforward."
"It can also help with capacity planning, sizing, and maximizing overall performance in a large scale environment."
"It's user friendly."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager is a scalable solution."
"I like that it's stable."
"The solution's email hosting pricing could be improved."
"From a security perspective, there is always something that can be improved as we serve our customers."
"Could be more user friendly; security features should be improved."
"The solution's initial setup was a bit complex in the beginning."
"I would prefer Microsoft Azure to increase the free trial, then developers can take advantage, and it could increase their sales."
"The solution is too expensive."
"The security must be improved."
"We need more security to be available on our smartphones and mobile devices."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
"The product must improve its support team."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The tool's pricing is costly."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager's scalability is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
"In my opinion, rather than a younger DBA, think the user interface could be improved."
"The solution's agents work with Java, and the Java code sometimes consumes a lot of memory on the CPU."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 299 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.