We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Java Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Managed storage capabilities, which create a very simple way to create, copy, and replicate local or geo-replicate, it's very simple to assign workloads."
"The most valuable features are the interface and customizability."
"We didn't have any problems setting it up."
"The robust encryption services increase the confidence of tech users."
"The solution is very simple to set up."
"Infrastructure as a service is most valuable."
"The system is more secure, and this is valuable."
"It is easy to deploy."
"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."
"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."
"One key feature is getting to choose the Virtual Machine configurations while setting up the server, which is an automated process."
"Cloud has provided less maintenance."
"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."
"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."
"The pricing in our region can be a bit high."
"Microsoft Azure can improve by adding more features for virtual machines, such as tier virtual machines."
"Microsoft Azure could improve by having more virtual machine operating systems available."
"The product's initial setup process and stability need improvement."
"Its pricing should be better. In terms of features, I am yet to explore the whole solution, and the current features seem okay."
"In a month, there is a plan to increase pricing, which is something we are not looking forward to."
"The solution could be easier to use. However, when comparing it to AWS it is a bit easier."
"Microsoft Azure needs to be simplified to make it better understood for users."
"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."
"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."
"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 299 reviews while Oracle Java Cloud Service is ranked 19th in PaaS Clouds with 15 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Java Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Java Cloud Service writes "User-friendly code development solution needing enhancements addressing glitches". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Java Cloud Service is most compared with Amazon AWS and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.