We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Oracle Java Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am impressed with the solution's EC2 EKS."
"We can easily upgrade and downgrade the Instance."
"I am happy with the dashboard."
"I like the flexibility of this solution."
"Using AWS is really helpful for saving costs."
"It has helped reduce the cost by rationing the computing power and paying only on a per usage basis, instead of provisioning unneeded, idle, or unutilized computing power that is used only at 20% of its capacity or time."
"Provisioning and resource administration include billing dashboards, which are very extensive."
"It streamlines tasks like table creation and data loading into Redshift, making the process more efficient and manageable."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."
"Cloud has provided less maintenance."
"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."
"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."
"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."
"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."
"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."
"It should be easier to monitor the performance and generate analytic information so that we can determine how to provide better support for our clients."
"I would appreciate more direct support from AWS."
"An easier way to determine estimated costs quickly would be helpful."
"The product should reduce carbon emissions."
"They could lower the cost. The setup could also be easier."
"Amazon AWS could improve on security."
"It works very well with open-source solutions like Java, but not with .NET technologies."
"It's sometimes a challenge to manage billing on this platform. It takes a lot of labor to generate billing for our customers from the service on the cloud."
"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."
"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Oracle Java Cloud Service is ranked 19th in PaaS Clouds with 15 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Oracle Java Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Java Cloud Service writes "User-friendly code development solution needing enhancements addressing glitches". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, Red Hat OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Oracle Java Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and Microsoft Azure. See our Amazon AWS vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.