We performed a comparison between MicroStrategy and Oracle OBIEE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It plays a vital role in establishing a connection with predictive continuous improvement."
"The architecture is very solid."
"Transaction Services, that was really the part of the tool that made it very compelling for us, because it gave the opportunity to drive action."
"It is scalable and integration-friendly."
"The convenience of it. Having it on the mobile, so someone has it right there in their pocket most of the time."
"We use MicroStrategy as an integrated solution with some of their other CRM type applications."
"This solution has allowed us to become a top-class competitor among other consulting companies."
"It was easy to install and implement a report with it."
"The performance can issue queries to work in the Oracle database in Oracle's native language. There are a lot of visualizations which suit our business."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The solution's initial setup was straightforward."
"Ability to create our own reports."
"I think having the conformed structures makes it a lot easier for end users and pulling reports together."
"The centralized metadata model component is most valuable."
"The security is good. For example, we can implement column-level security."
"The main features of this solution are that it is easy to use, intuitive, and user-friendly. When I retrieve the data from the database it is in a very raw form, then when I use the Oracle Report Builder it has advanced intelligence features to allow me to view and make changes to the data easily."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the various scenarios the product offers and its stability."
"This solution is missing enhanced features in the dashboards."
"They should give proper industry-based tutorials so that one can learn it easily and implement it based on the requirements. They should give more MMP files so that we can import a whole project altogether and learn from that project."
"I don't think that they will, but I'd like to see parallel processing, scalable parallel processing."
"The areas that have room for improvement in MicroStrategy are mainly related to building additional tools. Specifically, the embedding process has been a bit of a struggle."
"Data preparation-wise, it was not so straightforward with respect to getting different sources. Preparing or transforming the data inside and then bringing it onto the dashboard was a bit difficult, and the experience could have been better."
"Scalability is something which will need to be improved when it goes to a bigger audience."
"There are some challenges in our organization on how we store the data."
"Our data warehouse is sort of static; negative load and that is it. It is not as real-time as we would like. We are working on building that out first to create more real-time, at which point we will work on some potential integrations with other applications, but I don't think we are there yet."
"Even though we have a feature to enable the physical query to be seen in the log, in case of any issues, it is challenging to debug and see or identify where is the issue. For example, we designed the OBIEE repository and deployed it into the server, and we are now accessing and creating a report. For some reason, if the report is not working as expected, it is very difficult to identify the issue. We have a feature to see the physical query that is being generated in the central OBIEE server. I feel that this feature should have been available at the repository level so that while designing the repository, we can select the presentation columns and the query it is going to create. This will avoid the additional task of deploying a feature into the server and then testing the report. It will also make the implementation process friendly if, while designing the repository, we can see: How is a feature working? Are any of the presentation columns selected? How is the query being generated? Which query is being generated? Are any joints used? What kind of joints are used? Having this kind of information will make Oracle OBIEE more powerful and developer-friendly."
"Oracle OBIEE could improve by having better integration and compatibility with other vendors."
"Implementation is cumbersome and requires expertise."
"I would like to see Machine Learning included in this solution."
"The performance could be better."
"The performance could improve and in a future release, they could provide more virtualization options."
"BI Server"
"I would like to see the data wrangling features enhanced."
MicroStrategy is ranked 8th in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools with 155 reviews while Oracle OBIEE is ranked 3rd in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools with 154 reviews. MicroStrategy is rated 8.2, while Oracle OBIEE is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of MicroStrategy writes "A robust solution for powerful data analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle OBIEE writes "A solution that is easily accessible, scalable and requires a straightforward initial setup process to get started". MicroStrategy is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, IBM Cognos, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform and Amazon QuickSight, whereas Oracle OBIEE is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, IBM Cognos, Tableau and Looker. See our MicroStrategy vs. Oracle OBIEE report.
See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.
We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
