We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"All ETL code is stored in repositories in underlying database schemas. The number of users can access and work on the same solution using a client tool. So distributed teams can work on this tool in an efficient manner."
"The CAEM is very useful in its modularity and portability."
"It's completely user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of ODI is the to use of the whole ETL to create a data lake."
"The most valuable features of ODI are the knowledge modules, such as the Loading Knowledge module and the Check Knowledge module, they are helpful. We can check for the constraints in ODI. That helps in figuring out what are the constraints that are the primary keys created in the tables. We can check them with the Check Knowledge module."
"All our systems can be widely integrated by ODI, such as transactional systems, our data warehouses, and B2B integration."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable features of ODI are the ease of development, you can have a template, and you can onboard transfer very quickly. There's a lot of knowledge modules available that we can use. If you want to connect, for example, a Sibyl, SQL, Oracle, or different products, we don't have to develop them from scratch. They are available, but if it's not, we can go into the marketplace and see if there's a connector there. Having the connector available reduces the amount of hard work needed. We only have to put the inputs and outputs. In some of the products, we use there is already integration available for ODI, which is helpful."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"The stability could be better."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"It needs easier security."
"The initial setup is complex, especially if you also have to install a console."
"At present, when multiple steps are executed in parallel in the load plan and errors occur, the error handling mechanism does not function correctly."
"Overall the product is fine, but sometimes its reports unknown errors while we compile ETL scripts."
"The performance of the user interface is in need of improvement."
"The solution lacks some functions and features."
"The interface of ODI could be improved. For example, navigating and finding functions can be difficult. For example, you have to know which step you need to go to look at where your job status is. The logical step is a bit complex compared to other tools. It's much easier to get a graphical view, but with ODI, it's graphical, plus you have to know all the other pieces that fit around it. You have to think about the logical and physical aspects."
"ODI could improve by focusing on streamlining its features without unnecessary overhead."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 68 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS and Azure Data Factory. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.