We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"Ease of installation, maintenance and powerful outputs and supporting Big Data and Cloud environment as well as OGGCS (Oracle Golden Gate Cloud Service)."
"With Oracle GoldenGate, you can easily sync the tables and put them into the ODS database."
"Oracle GoldenGate helps to select and target specific tables for replication. Any changes or operations on those tables are immediately reflected in the source and target environments."
"It works best with Oracle."
"The CDC feature is interesting."
"The product is reliable for data integrity."
"The live application feature is most valuable. The solution is stable. I rate it a seven out of ten."
"You can use Oracle GoldenGate as a DR for your system."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"Technical support for Oracle products needs to be more efficient (at least locally in Egypt)."
"The product lacks some features and it's expensive."
"The solution costs a lot."
"The solution's licensing price is very expensive and could be made more competitive."
"The solution's performance needs improvement."
"The solution, in general, should be easier to use, with less need to perform workarounds within the system."
"GoldenGate is expensive. It's costly because this solution is unique in our market. The GoldenGate Cloud Service is cheaper than the on-premise solution."
"You cannot put everything in Golden Gate for the license and large models."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 48 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.