We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and SSIS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"The platform's cloud integration capabilities are good."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"SSIS integrates well with SQL servers and Microsoft products."
"It's something I needed for bulk imports. I'm not a big fan of it, but I haven't seen anything better."
"Its compatibility with Microsoft products has been very valuable to our company. It fits well within the architecture."
"You can get data from any data source with SSIS and dump it to any outside source. It is helpful. Getting, extracting, converting, and dumping data doesn't require much effort because we can do everything in the user interface. You drag and drop, then give the required input. It's intuitive."
"Like most Microsoft products, SSIS is user-friendly and easy to use."
"The performance is good."
"This solution is easy to implement, has a wide variety of connectors, has support for Visual Basic, and supports the C language."
"I have found its most valuable features to be its package management capabilities and the flexibility it offers in designing workflows."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"The solution could improve by having quicker release updates."
"Improvement as per customer requirements."
"It needs more integration tools, so you can connect to different sources."
"SSIS is stable, but extensive ETL data processing can have some performance issues."
"Tuning using this solution requires extensive expertise to improve performance."
"The performance of SSIS could improve when comparing it to Oracle Database."
"The solution should work on the GPU, graphical processing unit. There should also be piping integration available."
"The solution could improve on integrating with other types of data sources."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews while SSIS is ranked 2nd in Data Integration with 69 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while SSIS is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SSIS writes "Maintaining the solution and contacting its support team is easy". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas SSIS is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Talend Open Studio, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and AWS Glue. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SSIS report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.