We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows."
"This is a customizable product."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as we can configure it to best suit our requirements."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"The workflow designing and integration are the most valuable features. Also, the UI design was pretty easy."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"The solution offers excellent workflows."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed."
"The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool."
"It needs more integration with other platforms."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
"Pega BPM could improve the UI, it is poorly designed to have a good UX experience."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"It is scalable, but it also interacts with a lot of other systems. I think they thought that the interface to other systems, legacy systems, was its strength, but when problems do occur, quickly diagnosing those problems has been a challenge."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Bizagi and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and Microsoft Power Apps. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.