We performed a comparison between Open EDR and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"The stability is very good."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Comodo includes a firewall and antivirus in one solution. I also like the ability to remotely manage update packages on your systems. Comodo can even find a lost device and secure it remotely."
"It has the ability to share, which is not available in other products."
"It's made it easier for us to monitor the security environment in general."
"Using the product as a service on the cloud has helped reduced employee workloads."
"Its real-time features are valuable. It is in real-time, and it works fine."
"Trend Micro Apex One has good features and is lightweight."
"One of the advantages for me is that it is very easy to use."
"Along with the anti-malware, it has a built-in device control and DLP."
"I think this is the best solution in the category of endpoint protection, it's really excellent. It's better than McAfee."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"Comodo includes a firewall and antivirus in one solution. I also like the ability to remotely manage update packages on your systems. Comodo can even find a lost device and secure it remotely."
"The solution could use signatureless detection."
"There is room for improvement in the reporting aspect"
"Occasionally, the system may be a bit slow."
"We cover many things, but there is something called ATP, advanced threat prevention. I think they need to invest in this technology."
"We're not sure if we're going to continue with those products or their products or we're going to switch to something else. That's why we stopped the immigration process. If we were going to replace another product, it's not really efficient to waste time on it moving patients and other clients."
"The security features need improvement."
"The main thing they need to improve is their reporting functionality and the forensics for their on-premise consult. They do not have very good reporting features or forensic functionality in the on-premise version. They need to improve that."
"I would like to have DLP features implemented into Vision One Security."
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Open EDR is ranked 48th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 1 review while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ranked 6th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 125 reviews. Open EDR is rated 8.0, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Open EDR writes "I also like the ability to remotely manage update packages on your systems, and the fact that there is an open source version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security writes "We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console". Open EDR is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon and Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.