We performed a comparison between PractiTest and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools."The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the dashboard."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition."
"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."
"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."
"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."
"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."
"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."
"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."
"It would be nice if they would add an export to Word."
"This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this."
"TestRail should improve its pricing."
"Better prediction of text."
"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."
"I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were."
Earn 20 points
PractiTest is ranked 15th in Test Management Tools while TestRail is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.8, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". PractiTest is most compared with Jira, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.