We performed a comparison between RadView WebLOAD and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting."
"The solution is simple and useful."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"There is no analytical dashboard."
"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."
"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"The product must provide more integration."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
RadView WebLOAD is ranked 11th in Performance Testing Tools with 9 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. RadView WebLOAD is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process but the reporting is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Tricentis NeoLoad, Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and k6 Open Source, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.