We performed a comparison between Resolver GRC Suite and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The dashboard is nice. We can provide different levels of access to users based on their titles, privileges, rights, etc. It streamlines the process of auditing and technical compliance."
"The most valuable feature is the enterprise module, which provides the capability of having all of the information stored and linked with everything else."
"Integration is another great aspect of RSA Archer. From the beginning, integration has been a central focus for RSA, and Archer has always integrated well with most tools on the market today."
"It has the best workload management features."
"It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
"This solution helped us with the centralization of our governance data, so we could house all of our controls in one place. We could use that central repository of all our controls to build our risk management strategy and our policy and governance. So we could use controls as a central library and build policy, and then build risk management around it."
"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"GRC Suite could have better third-party risk assessment. Maybe they can have a module that can perform certain jobs like security incident and vulnerability management because I haven't seen this module on their platform."
"It would be useful for customers if COBIT 2019 could be translated into different languages."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"There should be a way to export and get data from the system in PDF or PowerPoint presentation format. This would be a great addition."
"The ticket handling process could be improved."
"In terms of what can be improved, our client always says their user experience, IU/UX in RSA Archer. They found it is not as user friendly as other tools."
"There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."
"An area for improvement would be the user interface. They could also offer more on-demand applications free of cost."
"When we have to do formulas or some other type of calculation in Archer, it sometimes doesn't work correctly. The fields don't display right, and we have to contact RSA Archer support to fix things. I think the calculation components are a bit complicated."
Earn 20 points
Resolver GRC Suite is ranked 21st in GRC while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. Resolver GRC Suite is rated 8.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Resolver GRC Suite writes "It streamlines the process of auditing and technical compliance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Resolver GRC Suite is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.