We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"This is stable and scalable."
"The best thing is it has a secure shell command that you can use to get into any endpoint and do some jobs."
"Device control and network control are valuable."
"Being able to keep track of the endpoints and the data that is available from the endpoints is valuable. We can see the patch levels, whether Windows endpoints are active or inactive, and who is the last user that was logged on. We get a lot of granular information that is valuable even what we are not talking from a security standpoint."
"The most valuable features of SentinelOne are the endpoint detection of threats, and it does not only rely on signatures for detection."
"It has helped to reduce our organizational risks."
"The most valuble feature of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is the recovery and zero-day detection."
"The solution offers excellent detection and integration capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the automatic remediation."
"I have not received any complaints about the performance."
"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."
"Provides protection against threats."
"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."
"The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"There is room for improvement with the management interface. It could be more user friendly."
"Managing the alerts is a challenge. Singularity generates a lot of alerts and false positives."
"Their documentation could afford to be a little bit better communicated. A lot of times we have to look at things in the knowledge base, and much of that could be communicated better, but that would probably be the only thing that needs to be improved."
"In the beginning, we had some issues with their product on some of the Windows 32-bit operating systems."
"I would like to see category-based web filtering."
"Everything is now offered as a service, so the console and the licensing model can be improved to make things easier, especially when updating new versions of the software."
"We'd like SentinelOne to upgrade automatically. It doesn't automatically update the agent if some system has an older version of the SentinelOne. It has to be triggered from the console."
"SentinelOne should include Ranger Pro out of the box with Singularity Complete."
"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."
"The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."
"Sometimes, one might face issues with the scalability of the product. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."
"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 177 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 49 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Darktrace, CrowdStrike Falcon, ThreatLocker Protect and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Fortinet FortiClient. See our SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.