We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Technical support is excellent."
"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"The independent modules are very good."
"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
"Trellix Endpoint Security has a full suite of DLP."
"It has a feature called Isolation. If a device is compromised, we can connect it to our SOC, and no one would be able to access it. This way we can limit the damage to the network while we are investigating."
"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"One of the better features, in my opinion, is that it also makes use of a web reputation. For example, if someone accidentally clicks on a link in an email that leads to a malicious website, they will block it."
"Its scalability and the central point of XDR so that all items are centrally reporting to one solution are the most valuable features."
"Using the product as a service on the cloud has helped reduced employee workloads."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Apex One is the response time and detection module."
"It has the ability to share, which is not available in other products."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"Offers great application control, vulnerability protection, and behavior monitoring."
"I use Trend Vision One Endpoint Security for work control, application control, firewall, whitelist and blocklist filtration, analysis, monitoring, deep security for the servers, major monitoring, and IPS modules."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The solution is not stable."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
"The solution can be expensive."
"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."
"Sometimes, one might face issues with the scalability of the product. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."
"I think that this product needs to improve the data loss prevention port."
"I can't think of any specific areas that need improvement."
"In the next release, I would like to see IBS included in OfficeScan."
"I want more options and flexibility when creating rules. I want to set rules that are contingent, like "If this happens, then this, this, and this will happen.""
"The solution could use extra dashboards and offer more analytics."
"One of Trend Micro's weaknesses is its high resource utilization."
"The technical support should be more proactive."
"Trend Vision One Endpoint Security should have a DLP (Data loss prevention) module."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 49 reviews while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 125 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security writes "We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console". Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon and Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.