User Reviews of OpenText ALM / Quality Center & Polarion ALM
Updated March 2024
Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Polarion ALM based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
OpenText ALM / Quality Center review
Robertino Catalin Ionescu
Department Manager of Testing Automation Centre at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
User-friendly, helpful automated testing, and support many technologies
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is one of the best tools on the market. I strongly recommend using Micro Focus ALM Quality Center to capitalize on the work that is done within the tool for future activities, such as regression testing and training. Unlike working with Excel or Word documents, the work you do in this tool remains accessible...
Polarion ALM review
Harold Pogue
Global IT Director of Digital Platforms. Digital and Connected Commerce at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Easy to deploy, customizable, but poor stability
The solution's editing capabilities need improvement. I would like the traceability and the generation of trace matrices beefed up. Felix ALM had a very flexible and powerful trace matrix capability, that Polarion ALM doesn't have. Currently, we have a person that writes scripting to do trace matrices across requirements tests, and...
Since 2012, we've had 768,740 professionals use our research.
As seen in