User Reviews of IBM WebSphere Message Broker & Red Hat Fuse

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing IBM WebSphere Message Broker and Red Hat Fuse based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






IBM WebSphere Message Broker review

Akash Dalebehera
Akash Dalebehera
Technical Specialist at BT - British Telecom
Facilitates communication with legacy systems well, seamless, and highly effective
Taking into account the technical aspect of IBM WebSphere Message Broker as a stand-alone solution, it has proven to be extremely stable and of high quality. However, in comparison to its industry competitors, such as MuleSoft or other ESB solutions, the issue with IBM is that they frequently release new versions of the solution, resulting...
Red Hat Fuse review

Kaushal  Kedia
Kaushal Kedia
Technical Manager at HCL Technologies
Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing...
What needs to be improved in Red Hat Fuse is on the development side because when you use it for development purposes, it lacks a user interface compared to what MuleSoft has, so it's a bit difficult for users. There are good and bad points in Red Hat Fuse, but mostly the solution has good points. There's also another similar product in the...

Since 2012, we've had 768,857 professionals use our research.

As seen in