User Reviews of Azure Firewall Manager & Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing Azure Firewall Manager and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






Azure Firewall Manager review

Arunkumar Vaidynathan
Arunkumar Vaidynathan
Cloud Consultant at Tata Consultancy
Reasonably priced and scaled well but needs reverse NAT-ing capabilities
With Azure Firewall, the problem is that the NAT-ing still has to be improved. They need reverse network address translation (NAT) capabilities. We cannot get the same NAT-ing capability as what we had in the on-premise deployment, where we could have multiple sources of IP coming in and could be NAT-ed to a specific IP. Similarly, we...
Palo Alto Networks Panorama review

AnkurKumar
AnkurKumar
Consultant at HCL Technologies
Great centralized management, makes it easy to push policies, and is easy to set up
In Panorama, installing the policy, and pushing the policy, it's quite seamless. It is a centralized management tool. Instead of logging into each firewall and configuring it or deploying the policies, it's quite easy as everything is in one place. We can push the policy and install the policies centrally instead of individually on each...

Since 2012, we've had 768,740 professionals use our research.

As seen in