User Reviews of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) & Kryon RPA

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Kryon RPA based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) review

Saman Guruge
Saman Guruge
Senior Engineer at MIT ESP
We can connect to different databases and use inbuilt activities, but we can't...
We can use its inbuilt activities, and it's a complete package, but just like ElectroNeek, a limitation is that we have to depend on its inbuilt activities. We can't include our own activities or we can't introduce other activities. When it comes to deployment and scheduling bots, there are some conflicts. They are using Microsoft MQ to...
Kryon RPA review

Bavaji PShaik
Bavaji PShaik
Intelligent Automation Program Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Excellent end-to-end workflow management but document extraction needs improvement
There are a few areas that can be improved. Firstly, Kryon RPA needs to enhance the robustness of its multi-board architecture to ensure the availability of bots on multiple machines. Secondly, Kryon RPA should focus on improving document extraction. When compared to other integrated products, such as those offered by its competitors, its...

Since 2012, we've had 770,292 professionals use our research.

As seen in