User Reviews of OpenText UFT Developer & Parasoft SOAtest

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing OpenText UFT Developer and Parasoft SOAtest based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






OpenText UFT Developer review

reviewer1475940
Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
Great features with good stability and an easy initial setup
The pricing could be improved. It's a bit high right now. They could make it more reasonable. Currently, the functionalities do not exist on Ranorex or UFT, however, as the industry continues to evolve and put more applications into a mobile device, the implementation of testing in a mobile device, using either Ranorex or UFT or XYZ, et...
Parasoft SOAtest review

Ajit Kumar Rout
Ajit Kumar Rout
Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial
Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved
In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and...

Since 2012, we've had 768,740 professionals use our research.

As seen in