We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"The tool is user-friendly."
"We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"Development on Apache Airflow is really fast, and it's easy to use with the newer updates. Everything is in Python, so it's not hard to understand. They also have a graphical view, so if you are not a programmer and you are just an administrator, you can easily track everything and see if everything is working or not."
"We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."
"Since Apache works very well on Python, we can manage everything and create pipelines there."
"Its user-friendly interface makes it straightforward to operate, offering a plethora of features for data preparation, buffering, and format conversion."
"I found the following features very useful: DAG - Workload management and orchestration of tasks using."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"The documentation must be improved."
"Enhancements become necessary when scaling it up from a few thousand workflows to a more extensive scale of five thousand or ten thousand workflows."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"I want to see Apache Airflow have more integrations with more production-based databases since it is an area where the product lacks currently."
"UI can be improved with additional user-friendly features for non-programmers and for fewer coding practitioner requirements."
"The platform's stability needs improvement, particularly regarding occasional interruptions due to networking issues."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with ARIS BPA, Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our Apache Airflow vs. OpenText ProVision report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.