We performed a comparison between Apache Web Server and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its community is its most valuable feature. Solving problems is easier on Apache because so many people know this product."
"The open-source nature is one of its most significant advantages."
"Apache Web Server is free of cost."
"Apache has proven to be incredibly reliable, and everything has operated smoothly without encountering any issues."
"It is scalable."
"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."
"The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly."
"The product is very cheap and stable."
"When we talk about .NET development, we use Visual Studio IDE to create these things. In recent years, there have been a lot of improvements in Visual Studio 2022. It would be a daunting task to list all of the features that have benefited us, as it would require a lot of time and effort. However, there are definitely many improvements year after year in .NET development."
"The .NET framework is a mature platform that is very helpful and saves time during the software development process."
"I'd rate the solution as highly stable."
"Proven solution with valuable customization."
"Ease of use, the richness of the libraries and basically very good development tools."
"The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"Initial setup is straightforward. All the components are readily available."
"Microsoft .NET Framework’s most valuable features are web application development, RESTful services development, security, performance, and less memory footprint."
"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."
"The interface has room for improvement."
"The product's initial setup process could be easier for users."
"Its stability could be better."
"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."
"There isn't a dedicated customer support available"
"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."
"I want the user interface to be more user-friendly."
"Needs stronger security with respect to cloud issues."
"There are performance constraints when multiple users are accessing the application and that consumes CPU resources."
"I would like to see more pre-built features in the MVC framework because as it is now, it's very open and you have to develop your own controls in order to use it."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
"The product could have a better framework for application development."
"I would like to see a better response time from the technical support."
"In my opinion, this solution can be improved by providing out-of-the-box support for different types of libraries."
Apache Web Server is ranked 3rd in Application Infrastructure with 22 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. Apache Web Server is rated 8.6, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Web Server writes "Has good security, speed and traffic handling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". Apache Web Server is most compared with IIS, NGINX Plus, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Zend PHP Engine and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Windows Process Activation Services and WebLogic Suite. See our Apache Web Server vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.