We performed a comparison between IIS and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IIS is useful for the deployment of web applications...Its stability is good."
"Microsoft's technical support has always been very good."
"It is an easy-to-use and secure program."
"The solution is the easiest way to publish applications which have been designed by older development tools."
"The solution is highly reliable."
"The solution is simple and very easy to manage compared to Linux."
"It's very easy to publish."
"The solution is very easy to use and offers a quick deployment."
"When it comes to the user interface, the context is better than other tools because it is easier to use."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"Given that it's cross-platform right now, where you can use it on Windows and Mac, that is the single most significant feature that has resulted in wider adoption of .NET."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"Proven solution with valuable customization."
"Basically, .NET is simply is the easiest programming language to use, based on my experience."
"The most valuable thing about Microsoft .NET Framework is that it is an enterprise-grade language and platform."
"The solution is easy to use if the user is a developer or some technical person."
"The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution."
"I am using an older version of Windows Server IIS and the general management and navigation to get something done is not as straightforward as I hope it to be. The interface could be improved."
"The security must be improved."
"The documentation isn't very good and the options are very complex."
"The solution's black box is not fast."
"IIS needs to improve its security. Its support needs to be faster and clear. The tool's licensing could be cheaper as well."
"We've never had any issues with the solution, but it's still nice to have overall improvements on it. It could be easier and faster to use, for example."
"The customer service and support team can be improved."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"You need to have the technical expertise to use this product."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"Needs stronger security with respect to cloud issues."
"They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers."
"I would like more web integration."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
"They could enhance support for Python within Visual Studio, as integrating Microsoft products with other frameworks can present a steep learning curve."
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and IBM WebSphere Application Server, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server, Windows Process Activation Services and WebLogic Suite. See our IIS vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.