We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The tool offers a lot of support, and there is a lot of knowledge material available, along with a lot of community groups."
"In my opinion, the best thing about Microsoft .NET is the fully featured framework. It provides most of the things which a normal developer requires of any application out of the box."
"Microsoft .NET Framework reduces the cost of entry and enables the development of applications with mature and enterprise features, thereby lowering the entry barriers."
"The product has a good interface and easy-to-use programming language."
"The most valuable features are the Domain Controller and the WBFS Manager."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the central console, that allows you to see all of the activated and deactivated computers."
"Microsoft has its own product called Blazor, but I don't think it's quite as powerful yet as React or Angular. That's an area for improvement."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
"Microsoft .NET Framework has a steep learning curve, which could be improved."
"The solution is difficult to learn if someone is learning it for the first time."
"This solution is best used with some training."
"I would like more web integration."
"It would be nice if the framework were able to work with additional environments and systems like Linux."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"The stability of the solution needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and WebLogic Suite, whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with IIS.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.