We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up."
"Connectors are very useful for streamlining data integration tasks."
"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"It's quite similar to Power Optima, but I use it mainly to integrate with databases, and it works well for that purpose."
"Its integration capabilities are great, allowing connectivity with various applications and services."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services."
"The solution is scalable."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure."
"The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people."
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."
"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."
"Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 12th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi iPaaS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and SnapLogic, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Amazon API Gateway. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
