We performed a comparison between Armis and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"The technology is good."
"The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."
"Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"The predictive prioritization features are pretty good. They do a lot of research and we trust the research that they do internally. They have knowledge of what's going on with many companies, where we only get a view into what's going on here. So the ability to get best practices out of them as part of this solution, is valuable to us."
"What is useful to me is being able to fulfill very customized scanning policies. In the clinical environment, because of vendor control, we can't perform credential-vulnerability scanning. And network scans, which I've done before, can cause a lot of impact. Being able to create very customized policies to be able to routinely scan and audit our clinical networks, while simultaneously not causing impact, is important to us."
"The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs."
"The solution is completely stable and operation is user-friendly."
"The solution is very intuitive and the dashboards are simple to use."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"The biggest issue I have with the solution is when I'm using the scanning it picks up the original DNS of that device. That means, before we image it and actually change the DNS to something within our company structure, it'll just be random numbers and letters and Tenable will stick to that DNS for a long time."
"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."
"The user interface can be improved."
"The reporting side can be improved. The dashboards are nice, but exporting things out for reports for management was a little tough."
"The pricing is reasonable, but this could be brought down more aggressively, such as we see with Rapid7, Tenable SC's main competitor."
"The product should provide risk-based vulnerability management."
"Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."
"The solution's user interface has some issues."
Armis is ranked 13th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Armis writes "Improves device visibility and adapts according to an organization’s security demands". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Axonius, Claroty Platform and runZero, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Horizon3.ai. See our Armis vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
