We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a fairly stable solution."
"It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers."
"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."
"It has improved my organization by automating IT applications."
"Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."
"This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"I find that it provides better agility in regards to job execution features."
"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is batch processing."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"Ease of implementation for upgrades."
"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."
"Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier."
"Documentation and cross-application externals could be improved."
"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."
"It lacks support and integration with cloud computing platforms."
"The lack of documentation, that is an issue. When we do need to bring it down for maintenance, it is always a scary moment for us because we have never had it crash."
"To make it a lot more user-friendly, in order to make it so other people can use it without having to do much training with it; the more user-friendly it is, the easier it is to work with."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 8th in Workload Automation with 41 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.