We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It efficiently handles traffic, ensuring we are not running expenses and the infrastructure is strong enough to handle the load."
"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"It helps us to reduce the cost."
"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"ITSI includes a feature called a glass table."
"In my opinion, Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is better than QRadar. With the help of Splunk, we can get results."
"The root cause analysis is very helpful for us."
"I find the episode review, glass tables, and correlation search features very useful."
"The KPS used to automate the integration policy is the most valuable feature of Splunk ITSI."
"The observability is great and valuable."
"One particularly useful feature of Splunk ITSI is the ability to create custom services."
"ITSI's most valuable feature is that it's easy to integrate DLP."
"It could be cheaper."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."
"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"The tool must include AI features."
"Splunk ITSI lacks out-of-the-box solutions for enterprise users."
"I believe the refresh time should be faster."
"The dashboard queries should be improved. More queries should be suggested in order to produce better dashboards."
"It was an intimidating tool for us to jump into at the beginning."
"We also faced challenges relating to UI development."
"The license cost is expensive."
"We'd like them to show more inputs on the dashboard."
"It would be advantageous to enhance the dashboard by incorporating sections for monitoring, service health, and a filter for the KPIs."
More Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is ranked 12th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 30 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) writes "Helps improve our incident response time, and our mean time to resolve, but visibility is limited". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with , whereas Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Grafana, Dynatrace, Splunk APM and BMC TrueSight Operations Management. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.