We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Boomi iPaaS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."The most valuable feature for me is the visual interface of AWS Glue."
"It is a stable and scalable solution."
"I appreciate AWS Glue for its cost-effectiveness."
"The solution is highly user-friendly, and its features are easy to use. The new addition of AWS Glue Data Catalog is also very beneficial, making the tool even more helpful for its users."
"The solution integrates well with other AWS products or services."
"I like the fact that AWS Glue works with Python scripts."
"We no longer had to worry much about infrastructure management because AWS Glue is serverless, and Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure."
"Glue is a NoSQL-based data ETL tool that has some advantages over IIS and ISAs."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"The technical support for this solution could be improved. In future, we would like to connect more services like Athena or Kinesis to help control more loads of data."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"In terms of performance, if they can further optimize the execution time for serverless jobs, it would be a welcome improvement."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"In terms of improvement, the performance of AWS Glue could be faster."
"The product has only a few built-in transformations."
"I would like to see stable libraries at the moment they are not there."
"Only people who can code, either in Java or Python, can use the product freely. Those who don't know Java or Python might find using AWS Glue difficult."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, SSIS and Talend Open Studio, whereas Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Azure Data Factory.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.