We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"It has been a stable product."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."
"The tool supports gRPC."
"The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas."
"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."
"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."
"The deployment should be simplified."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."
"For code version control, you need to use some external software."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.