We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."I like the fact that AWS Glue works with Python scripts."
"The most valuable features currently are glue studio, jobs, and triggers."
"AWS Glue is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is its ease of use and good documentation. Additionally, we can do all the transformations that we need."
"It is AWS-integrated. There is end-to-end integration with the other AWS services. It is also user-friendly."
"The product has a valuable feature for data catalog."
"I like that it's flexible, powerful, and allows you to write your own queries and scripts to get the needed transformations."
"The solution integrates well with other AWS products or services."
"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"I particularly like the drag-and-drop feature for designing integrations and processes."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"The monitoring is not that good."
"The solution could be cheaper. The price of the solution is an area that needs improvement."
"It is not clear how the partition discovery would have been affected by more data coming in."
"We face performance issues when using AWS Glue for data transformation and integration."
"The technical support for this solution could be improved. In future, we would like to connect more services like Athena or Kinesis to help control more loads of data."
"Currently, it supports only two languages in the background: Python and Scala. From our customization point of view, it would be helpful if it can also support Java in the background."
"Glue could perform better. It sometimes takes too long to test a Glue job. Google Cloud Platform offers more Python scripts than AWS."
"The solution is expensive."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve the downloading and uploading of files. I've submitted this issue to the Oracle Idea Labs. The issue is from the front end of Oracle Integration Cloud, we cannot download or upload a file directly or drag and drop it."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"Make it more similar to the on-premises features. For example, if you can edit the code directly rather than just dragging and dropping, or if you can edit the examples by going into the background, and one-click migration, I'd like to see included in the next release."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, SSIS and Confluent, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate, Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
